Jayalalithaa convicted in disproportionate assets case. Generally, those who are accused in disproportionate assets case are rich and powerful persons with vast resources. Arithmetic errors in jayalalithaa s judgement in disproportionate assets case. Jaya jailed in corruption case, fined rs 100 crore india. Karnataka to sc this is the only way to recover the rs 100crore fine imposed on her, the state told the bench. Jayalalithaa should be convicted in disproportionate assets case even after death. Jayalalithaa, sasikala criminally conspired at poes garden to launder illgotten wealth. Why jayalalithaa cannot be termed as a convict in the disproportionate assets case traffic ramaswamy seeks cbi probe in kodanad estate controversy counsel for panel probing jayalalithaa s death. Jayalalithaa was on saturday sentenced to four years in prison after being convicted in an rs 66crore disproportionate assets case by a special sessions court in bangalore. Feb 14, 2017 it was one of the most awaited orders of the year. The case had political implications as it was the first case where a ruling chief minister had to step down on account of a court verdict.
Jun 07, 2016 sc reserves judgment in jayalalithaa disproportionate assets case. The court stated that the evidence led to the conclusion that the accused a1a4 jayalalithaa, sasikala, sudhakaran and ilavarasi had entered. Oct 09, 2014 aiadmk chief and former tamil nadu chief minister j jayalalithaa moved supreme court on thursday for bail and suspension of sentence in the assets case. A criminal case will always be tried as union of india state of tamil nadu eg vs defendent. Nov 25, 2017 tamil nadu chief minister j jayalalithaa today left for bangalore to appear in a special court which would pronounce judgement in the 18yearold rs 66.
Mar 10, 2016 the 1977 case law which the high court has relied on holds that an offence was not made out if the value of disproportionate assets was found to be less than 10 per cent of the income, karnataka. The assets under the purview of the case span over 1,200 ha. Jayalalithaa assets case judgement pdf court in the jayalalithaa disproportionate assets case and restored in full da case verdict shows that the corrupt cannot escape from law. Read the 1,6 pages that jailed jayalalithaa helped by. Jayalalitha and three of her associates were acquitted in the disproportionate. Disproportionate assets case transferred to bengaluru by supreme court on petition filed by dmk leader k anbazhagan on the grounds. Jaya jailed in corruption case, fined rs 100 crore india news. May 12, 2015 arithmetic errors in jayalalithaa s judgement in disproportionate assets case. Timeline of jayalalithaas and sasikalas disproportionate. Jayalalithaa moves supreme court for bail in assets case. Later, on 11 may 2015, jayalalithaa was acquitted of all the charges by high court of karnataka.
Timeline of jayalalithaas and sasikalas disproportionate assets case supreme court upheld the trial courts judgment convicting general secretary v k sasikala in the disproportionate case. Nov 23, 2015 the supreme court today agreed to conduct daytoday hearing on appeals filed against the karnataka high court judgement acquitting tamil nadu chief minister j jayalalithaa and three others in a. What really happened in the jayalalithaa wealth case verdict. Read full judgment and operative parts here the sc upheld the calculations and conclusions of the trial court, and dismissed the karnataka hcs. Jayalalithaa, chief minister of the southern indian state of tamil nadu, in a disproportionate assets case filed against her by the former dmk government. Tamil nadu congress committee chief evks elangovan has issued a statement that judgement in disproportionate assets case is full of errors. Karnataka high court will today pronounce the verdict on former tamil nadu chief minister jayalalithaa s appeal against her conviction in the disproportionate assets da case that will have a bearing on her political future. Supreme court reserves judgment in jayalalithaa da case read timeline murali krishnan. Jayalalithaa da case karnataka high court appeal verdict, in pdf format pdf 3. Full text of the judgement of supreme court of india for disproportionate assets case against jayalalithaa see other formats. Jayalalithaa should be convicted in disproportionate. Feb 14, 2017 how the da case verdict went against sasikala. Full text of the supreme court judgment on disproportionate assets. Her conviction has triggered massive protests across the.
Sc reserves judgment in jayalalithaa disproportionate. Full text of the supreme court judgment on disproportionate. The longawaited 911page order by justice john michael cunha, which convicted and jailed thenserving tamil nadu chief minister j jayalalithaa under the prevention of corruption act 1988 for holding disproportionate assets, has been published by the hindu today. Her conviction has triggered massive protests across the state, with. Former tamil nadu chief minister j jayalalitha has been acquitted by the karnataka high court in an 18yearold disproportionate assets case. The jayalalithaa acquittal is based on the krishnanand agnihotri case of 1977, which introduces the concept that disproportionate asset to the extent of 10 per cent d. The story of the disproportionate assets case began in 1996 at the instance of. The division bench of justices pc ghose and amitava roy has. Correction of one error can change verdict in jayalalithaa. The 21yearold disproportionate assets case more famously known as jayalalithaa da case was finally decided on tuesday by the supreme court. Yet another judgement day for jayalalithaa, karnataka high court to decide her appeal in corruption case a special court had convicted her in an 18yearold disproportionate assets case and sent her to jail in september 2014. In a landmark judgment supreme court of india has convicted vk sasikala, ilavarasi and sudhakaran in the disproportionate assets case. Jayalalithaa gets four years in prison in disproportionate.
It was a complaint by subramanian swamy in a chennai in 1996 that led to a probe against tamil nadu chief ministers jayalalithaa in what later came to be known as the disproportionate assets case in which she was convicted by a bangalore court today. The paper reported that front companies were used by her associates to hold properties in shoddy and murky deals. The judgement of supreme court of india for disproportionate assets case against jayalalithaa. Jayalalithaa and three others guilty in the 18yearold disproportionate assets case. Sasikala and others guilty, sc restores trial court. May 11, 2015 yet another judgement day for jayalalithaa, karnataka high court to decide her appeal in corruption case a special court had convicted her in an 18yearold disproportionate assets case and sent her to jail in september 2014. In the instant case, the disproportionate asset is less than 10% and it is within permissible limit therefore, the accused are entitled to acquittal. Jayalalitha assets judgment under prevention of corruption act. With justice cr kumarasamy of karnataka high court to deliver the judgment on aiadmk chief j jayalalithaas appeal against her conviction in assets case on monday, political leaders in tamil nadu have begun calculations of its possible results.
This is a case where the accused had managed to drag on the case for more than 19 years and filed a petition seeking appointment of public prosecutor and judge of her choice. Former tamil nadu chief minister j jayalalithaa was acquitted in the da case. May 11, 2015 following is the course of events in the disproportionate assets case against jayalalithaa that witnessed legal and political twists and turns in the last 19 years after the dmk government decided. The further case of the prosecution is that during the check period i. Jayalalithaa cannot be termed a convict in assets case. Jayalalithaa was a sixtime chief minister of the south indian state of tamil nadu. If the judgment debtor is a corporation, the person deposed is usually the president or a financial officer. Jayalalitha assets judgment under prevention of corruption act free ebook download as pdf file. Feb 14, 2017 in a landmark judgment supreme court of india has convicted vk sasikala, ilavarasi and sudhakaran in the disproportionate assets case. Jayalalithaa s close aide sasikala, her niece ilavarasi, her nephew and the chief ministers disowned.
Feb 10, 2017 karnataka special public prosecutor expresses displeasure over sc delay in sasi case orders the octogenarian senior lawyer pointed out that the supreme court had reserved its judgement on the case after hearing both sides in july. Jayalalithaa jayaram 24 february 1948 5 december 2016, commonly referred to as. In a post judgment context, the deposition is taken pursuant to the same rules and. Full text of the judgement of supreme court of india for.
The judgement on 27 september 2014 in the special court found all four parties guilty. The karnataka high court will pronounce it judgment in appeals filed by former tamil nadu chief minister j jayalalithaa and three of her associates against their conviction and jail term in an illegal assets case on monday, may 11. Jayalalithaa should be convicted in disproportionate assets. Jayalalithaa wealth case judgement jayalalithaa fainted. Feb 14, 2017 sasikala jayalalitha dpa supreme judgement text the judgement regarding the disappropriate assets case involving late. These appeals project a challenge to the judgment and order dated. The petition number 33174, however, is only for jayalalithaa.
Following is the chronology of events in the disproportionate assets da case involving late j jayalalithaa, v k sasikala and others. Karnataka special public prosecutor expresses displeasure. Jayalalithaa likely to be sworn in as cm within a week. Kumaraswamy, who pronounced the judgment, wrote that while calculating the total worth of assets and the expenditure for the marriage of jayalalithaa s foster son, also an accused in the case, the prosecution had exaggerated the values.
In a major victory for aiadmk, a special bench of the karnataka high court set aside the trial court order convicting former tamil nadu chief minister jayalalithaa in the disproportionate assets case. She was accused of misusing her office during her first tenure as chief minister during 199196 to amass properties worth. Sc you are reading full text of the supreme court judgment on disproportionate assets case jayalalithaa. Convicted in a disproportionateasset case, loses cm post. Karnataka hc to deliver verdict today on business standard. The karnataka hc on wednesday reserved judgment in the illegal assets case against former tamil nadu chief minister j jayalalithaa.
Subramanian swamy, then janata party chief, files a case against jayalalithaa alleging that during her tenure as tamil nadu chief minister from 1991 to 1996, she amassed properties worth rs 66. In this particular case against selvi jayalalithaa and others, i had to face many difficulties and hardships which i have explained in chapter xxv of my autobiography all from memory published. This means, the prosecution is handled by the government representatives, while the individual has access to all alleg. The judgement of supreme court of india for disproportionate. A special court in bangalore on saturday convicted tamil nadu chief minister j.
The supreme court verdict in the disproportionate assets case should the dvac, thanks to former chief minister jayalalithaa s hostility, was. Jayalalithaa, chief of the aiadmk, was also asked to pay a fine of rs 100 crore. The former cm had appealed against conviction, five year jail term and rs 100 crore fine awarded in the case by a trial court on september 27, 2014. Yet another judgement day for jayalalithaa, karnataka high. What does jayalalithas acquittal in the disproportionate. It will be a highstake test as the judicial outcome. High court to give its verdict in jayalalithaas illegal. I dont support the judgement but i read this on net so i would like to share it. Jayalalithaa convicted in corruption case, gets 4 yrs in. Hence, a public prosecutor conducting such cases will have to withstand temptations, incentives and other pressures, including threats. The madras high court wednesday held that former tamil nadu chief minister j jayalalithaa cannot be termed a convict in a disproportionate assets case and dismissed a petition challenging the construction of a memorial to her on the ground that she was on. A judgement on 27 september 2014 in the special court convicted all of the accusednamely. The supreme court today agreed to conduct daytoday hearing on appeals filed against the karnataka high court judgement acquitting tamil nadu chief minister j jayalalithaa and three others in a.
Jan 23, 2019 jayalalithaa, sasikala criminally conspired at poes garden to launder illgotten wealth. Sasikala jayalalitha dpa supreme judgement text ramanis blog. She was convicted in an 18yearold disproportionate assets case that was launched by janata party president subramanian swamy now a member of bharatiya janata party on 20 august 1996 on the basis of an income tax department report on her. Mandibular guide flange prosthesis pdf the guidance flange prosthesis helps in directing the deviating mandible to improve form and function. Jayalalitha and three of her associates were acquitted in the disproportionate assets case by a single judge of the. Jayalalithaa convicted in corruption case, gets 4 yrs in jail, rs 100 crore fine on business standard. When the principal accused jayalalithaa has been acquitted, the other accused, who have played a lesser role, are also entitled to acquittal.
Kanchi shankaracharya sankararaman murder case judgement. Theories do the rounds on verdict jayalalithaa was convicted by a trial court of misusing her position as cm between 1991 and 1996 to amass disproportionate assets of nearly rs 67 crore. Court of karnataka judgment acquiting jayalalithaa and others pdf. Here is a time line of all you need to know in the 21yearold case against jaya and sasikala. The supreme court verdict in the disproportionate assets case should the dvac, thanks to former chief minister jayalalithaas hostility, was. The purpose of the deposition is to discover what assets are available to satisfy the judgment. He submitted that as there is no remedy under the sarfaesi act to protect the lawful possession of the lessee under a lease and the act also does not bar the remedies under the respective local tenancy laws, this court should hold that the remedies for the parties in a case where the secured assets are in possession of the lessees are under the.
665 752 1354 464 1457 1177 1027 1499 1346 1334 118 175 16 692 1177 1048 1623 769 647 1062 122 1373 1214 405 824 558 109